News featuring a faculty member
The First and Second Amendments, federal government powers, the prosecution of former President Donald Trump, and ethics are among the topics Professor Jason Mazzone is anticipating will dominate the upcoming Supreme Court term. Writing at the News-Gazette, Mazzone highlights the cases and issues that could prove monumental. In his opinion piece, he goes through high- and lower-profile cases that “might sound nerdy” but “could significantly impact the lives of many Americans.”
Professor Jacob Sherkow travelled to Cologne, Germany, in September to deliver a lecture as part of the CMMC Symposium in Molecular Medicine. The Symposium was titled “From Concepts to Clinic: a New Era of Nucleic Acid Therapeutics,” and aimed to provide attendees with an in-depth understanding of the chemical, biological and clinical challenges in the field. Sherkow presented a speech titled “Nucleic Acid Platforms: US and EU regulatory challenges,” which was part of the preclinical and clinical application portion of the proceedings.
When the 2023 season concludes in college football, the game may never look the same again. Teams will switch long-time conference allegiances, players will switch teams, some conferences may cease to exist, and the playoff system will triple in size. This upheaval is triggered by money: money from television contracts and money on offer to students in the form of NIL (name, image and likeness) deals. In their examination of the changes at hand, the New York Times quoted Professor Michael LeRoy, who was unsparing in his criticism of the current state of college football. “This has become a soulless enterprise,” LeRoy said. “There is no moral compass. There is no brotherhood. Now you eat off your brother’s plate and you don’t care if he goes hungry.”
Professor Arden Rowell, an expert in environmental law, administrative law, risk regulation and human behavior, has joined the faculty of the Beckman Institute or Advanced Science and Technology. In addition to her work at the College of Law, Rowell will share her expertise with students of Beckman and continue her collaborative work with the faculty and researchers there. Rowell’s recent collaborations at Beckman have focused on work with Zahra Mohaghegh, an associate professor of nuclear, plasma, and radiological engineering.
In the past year, Shelby County, Tennessee, has a record of six bankruptcies per 1,000 residents, a rate that tops the nation. With none of the other 100 largest counties in the United States having more than four per 1,000, the difference is not particularly close, either. In their investigation of this phenomenon, MLK50: Justice Through Journalism, a nonprofit Memphis newsroom, quoted Professor Robert Lawless. “(Shelby County) is a tremendous outlier,” said Lawless. “It’s hard to think of a reason why (that is) except for legal practice.… I have no question that there are attorneys in Memphis doing the right things by their client.… And I have no question that there are attorneys in Memphis that are taking advantage of people.”
In a dramatic scene, police in Marion, Kansas, raided the offices of the Marion County Record newspaper in late August, seizing reporters’ cell phones and computers, among other items. The “unheard of” raid immediately raised questions of First Amendment protections afforded to newspapers like the Marion County Record, which is owned by former Illinois journalism professor Eric K. Meyer. To address these questions, the Illinois News Bureau interviewed Professor Lena Shapiro, director of the First Amendment Clinic, who was unequivocal in her assertion that the raid was a violation of the Constitution’s protections. “This raid should never have happened in the first place, and I hope that the embarrassing outcome for Marion County in the government officials’ pursuit of the raid serves as a deterrent to others who want to push aside First Amendment protections to retaliate against journalists,” she said.
Writing with fellow patent experts, Professors Bernard Chao and Timothy Holbrook of the University of Denver School of Law and Professor Mark A. Lemley of Stanford Law School, Professor Jacob Sherkow submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The brief is written in response to the decision made by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in a case involving Xencor Inc. In their previous decision, PTAB rejected a patent claim from Xencor, a decision Sherkow and his co-authors describe as “wrong on the law and wrong on the science.” The amicus brief supports Xencor’s claim and encourages the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to reverse the decision from PTAB.
In the case of Harrington v. Purdue Pharma, pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, Professor Ralph Brubaker has submitted an amicus brief arguing “Courts have no power to approve” the bankruptcy plan submitted by Purdue Pharma. Joined in writing the brief by fellow bankruptcy experts Professor Bruce Markell of Northwestern and Professor Jonathan Seymour of Duke, Brubaker and his co-amici assert that approval of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan from Purdue Pharma is not permissible under established law and would represent a violation of claimants’ due-process rights. The brief suggests that the Court should repudiate the discharge plan in order to “put an end to the abusive ‘bankruptcy grifting’ that this case vividly illustrates.”
On September 14-15, 2023, the Program in Constitutional Theory, History and Law was the co-sponsor of an international conference in Bologna, Italy, on the topic of landmark judgments in constitutional cases. The conference, organized by program director Jason Mazzone in collaboration with Professors Francesco Biagi (University of Bologna) and Justin Frosini (Bocconi University), brought together scholars from around the world to examine the designation, significance, and trajectory of landmark cases in different nations. Mirosław Granat, former Justice of the Constitutional Court of Poland, gave the conference keynote address. Papers from the conference will be published next year as a book. The conference was the fifth meeting of the Illinois-Bologna series in Constitutional History: Comparative Perspectives.
Though the record-breaking settlement Dominion received in its settlement with Fox News is frequently characterized as a “win” by commentators, the statement from Fox with the settlement was not apologetic, did not acknowledge any responsibility, and was not a retraction. In a new article written for the American Psychological Association, Professors Jennifer Robbennolt and Verity Winship, along with Jessica Bregant ’09 (now a professor at the University of Houston Law Center), dig into the psychological reasons people tend to infer that a settling defendant was responsible. Based on their research on settlements, the article provides a fascinating look at how perceptions can affect how lawsuits are settled.